A suggested AI Syllabus Statement...

In May 2024, the SDSU University Senate extended its definition of plagiarism to include the un-cited use of generative AI applications, specifically: “representing work produced by generative Artificial Intelligence as one’s own.” Academic freedom ensures that instructors are empowered to determine whether students may use genAI in their classes and to what extent. To minimize confusion, the inclusion of specific guidance regarding the use of generative AI in your class is strongly recommended. The following sample AI Syllabus Statement has been developed by the SDSU Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL) in consultation with campus experts on AI literacy. 

Students should not use generative AI applications in this course except as approved by the instructor. Any use of generative AI outside of instructor-approved guidelines constitutes misuse. Misuse of generative AI is a violation of the course policy on academic honesty and will be reported to the Center for Student Rights and Responsibilities.

Customize this minimal suggested language to suit your course. Find sample AI Syllabus Statements in CTL's "AI in the Classroom" Canvas module. Learn about developing an AI Syllabus Statement in SDSU’s Academic AI Micro-Credential Links to an external site.. And these Guidelines Links to an external site. offer best practices for setting expectations for student use of generative AI in your course, including four basic parameters: disallowed, restricted, documented, and unrestricted.